Showing posts with label innovation lab; agile. Show all posts
Showing posts with label innovation lab; agile. Show all posts

Friday, 23 February 2018

Let's get physical


2018 sees the first wave of “adults” born after the millennium – those who have grown up in the digital revolution for who technology and online are mundane, every day things, rather than something to marvel at.  As the “silver surfers” begin to make way for the generation for whom life before Facebook simply doesn’t exist – what relevance will the physical world play within the new digital age?

The good news is, that we’re not yet ready to be all be plugged into the Matrix and live our existence inside a virtual reality.  In the world of retail, despite the rise of convenient online shopping, almost 85% of sales are undertaken in a physical store.  The social experience of shopping is still something that people want to experience in the physical world.  What we’re beginning to see in this sector is that online and in-store working together in tandem.  Successful retailers are joining up these two channels into a holistic customer experience.  The so-called “bricks and clicks” environment is thriving because people still value what a physical store brings. 



The following roles of a physical interaction are still incredibly important:
  • Exchange
  • Personalisation
  • Technology gap
  • Accessibility
  • Security
  • Trust


Exchange
As we’re not all plugged into the Matrix, we still need physical things.  Some of these are “legacy” items such as documents that have not yet been digitised (Passports, Driving Licences, Certificates et al) whilst others are things that it’s unlikely they ever will (food, clothes, etc.).   Almost every frequent online shopper has experienced goods not being as described, or even fraud from untraceable sellers.  Trust in the physical world it seems still outshines that of the online environment.  Whilst many things are now shipped, often in incredibly quick timescales – with the promise of drones cutting it even more dramatically - we still have the need for a physical location for many of the things that make our life easier.  If you’re in the middle of doing something, the immediacy of the local shop is still hard to replicate for convenience.

Whether the exchange of a physical item is through shipping, self-service, or click and collect, we still need a physical experience for our online journey.

Personalisation
When you go to the supermarket for your groceries how often do you pick from the front of the shelf, or randomly dip into the apples?  The buying decision has so many dimensions, what the expiry date is, how shiny the apple is, whether the tin is slightly dented, how much fat is on the steak.  These considerations extend to a greater or lesser extent into other domains too.  Replicating personalisation online is hugely tricky without compromising on the reality of the customer experience.  It may be my vanity in believing that I look just like the model photographed wearing the clothes on the website.   When I buy clothes online it often results in incredible disappointment when the item finally arrives and I try it on at home. 

Whilst many online interactions don't have a physical element, for those that do this still needs to occur somewhere in the customer journey.  Where personalisation is low, the physical interaction can happen successfully at the end.  Where personalisation is increased, the physical interaction needs to move further forward in the overall experience.

Technology lag
The term smartphone is probably an outdated one.  Of all the things we do with these devices, using it as a phone is probably low down (and decreasing) as a percentage of time spent interacting with it.  Things that we may have done previously, such as getting a passport quality photo, the little device in our pocket can now do entirely online.  No longer do we need to go to a physical location.  The issue is that technology often follows a well-trodden path.  The camera in a mid-priced smart device delivers the same quality photos as an expensive, bulky camera would have 5-10 years ago.  Yet there is still a market for expensive, bulky cameras because they’re now as good as the cameras in smart devices will be in another 5-10 years’ time. 

Why we should care about physical from a technology perspective is similar to why we should care about Formula One.  The innovation in the car industry starts off as expensive, vanity, over-engineered non-sense to make the F1 car a 100th of a second faster.  It then gets productionised into top end vehicles before becoming a commodity item on every car. 

We should remember that technology doesn’t stop.  The generation who laughed at their elders trying to use the gramophone, will have been laughed at themselves as they tried to use the Betamax.  And they will have been laughed at trying to use the iPod.  And they will have been laughed at trying to stream a movie.  Technology will always be confusing at some point in our lives.  When it reaches that stage it's less likely that we'll be interested in owning it ourselves.

Accessibility
The knock-on impact of technology lag is accessibility.  When you need to be able to take a 3D photo to get a passport, this may have only made its way into the latest high end smart device.   Ubiquity needs to be delivered elsewhere. 

The availability of technology is only one part of the accessibility issue.  Competence is a major issue too.  Being able to use the internet is one thing.  Being able to complete a complex application form is another. 

Accessibility covers broad demographic and use cases, depending on what the need is.  When making a recent application myself, the requirement to “get someone to witness your signature who has known you for at least 5 years and isn’t a family member” caused me a considerable inconvenience.  In the digitally connected world many of my closest friends live the furthest from me.

Security
We’ve all seen the keyboard warrior.  The person who has a strong opinion and isn’t afraid to use the caps lock to GET THEIR POINT ACROSS.  Or the troll who sends offensive, abusive, threatening or persistent messages to one or many people.  There are two things that you can do (fairly easily) online that you can’t do (easily) in person.  One is that you can walk away unbruised.  The second is the volume in respect of effort.  If I wanted to shoplift a £1 item to make £1,000, doing that in person means I’ve got to go around a lot of shops and I my risk of getting caught is huge. 

I can spam several thousand people online in minutes, to get them to put money into an anonymous account in return for something that I don’t deliver on.  

We see the impact of this today with people “washing” fake documents through online document checkers in order to prioritise where to use them.  Walking into a physical location where the risk of apprehension of both the document and the individual is far riskier.

Doing things offline doesn't necessarily mean they're more secure - often its the opposite.  However they are different.  The risks change.  The controls change.  The mitigations change.  Using the right channel to get the right experience with the right security is how we get the right result.

Trust
When things do go wrong online, having a physical location to go to is often the only way of unpicking the situation and restoring the balance in the force.  This brings together many of the points raised so far.  It may be simply returning an item ordered online where I need to prove that the item was faulty.  Or it may be having to demonstrate a high level of security that simply cannot be achieved online.  Trust in the digital era is about having great experiences in both the online and offline worlds.

Getting in physical shape
In the financial sector, the advent of open banking will see the market opened up to more tech and online focussed services that those with an estate of retail outlets will have to compete against.  In order to do so, there is a need to focus on the services that customers value online and in store.  Ensuring that the online offer is as good as or better than the competition becomes the baseline.  The advantage comes from bringing the benefits of the retail network to complement this.

Thinking about the physical world isn’t about reverting to legacy ways of doing things.  The sepia tinted glasses of how great things were back in the day isn’t the way to view how to operate.  We should be making the right use of the offline and online channels to create a joined-up customer experience.  This will deliver a sustainable, relevant and valued bricks and clicks offering.  So, let’s get physically fit for the digital era.

Sunday, 1 November 2015

The upstarts at the startups

Startups disrupting big business is nothing new.  It's nearly 40 years since Apple set about changing how technology companies operated yet the difference today is the "unique" way in which Steve Jobs disrupted the status quo is now seen as normal behaviour.  There are numerous examples of how Jobs ignored the rules of business and went about doing what he wanted to do, how he wanted to do it.  For example the story of Jobs changing the colours of a global behemoth's corporate logo because it didn't fit the colour scheme of his own presentation.  If you told that story to the entrepreneurs in one of the many startup workspaces today you'd likely be greeted with lots of blinking, unimpressed faces.

The characteristics of the entrepreneur haven't necessarily changed - its the environment that has.  Barriers to getting your idea to market aren't what they were.  You can take your great idea, using cloud tech or a mobile platform and go to market with it quicker, easier and more cheaply than ever before.  As existing businesses open up their API's, the future of the startup becomes even more of a challenge to the status quo.

Today's entrepreneur can share a ride in an Uber car, to their office for the day that they found on Workspace, find a sofa to surf for the evening on AirBNB - after they've been fed and watered at a collaboration workshop from MeetUp of course.  The very way in which Apple began 40 years ago is now a commoditised digital industry that enables more startups to launch more ideas to disrupt more of the status quo more easily.

How existing corporates respond to the changing (changed) landscape in the world of the startup will be key to their own futures.  Having your own offices, infrastructure, employees and everything else that comes with being a corporate needs money - and that becomes more of a liability and less of an asset in competing with the startups.  Not having a brand reputation for a start-up becomes a positive because they have nothing to lose.  A thousand startups can come and go before one lands that disrupts the landscape - yet as the startup itself becomes a disposable commodity, the higher the rate of turnover and the more frequent the disruption.




Corporates who "want to foster the startup culture" often miss the point that they have a brand reputation to look after, that they have enough money to make it worth being sued and that their staff expect to sleep in their own bed not on someone else's sofa.  Its not enough just to let someone wear a pair of shorts and a vaguely offensive t-shirt and think that you're acting like a start up.

To stay relevant in 10 years time, big business does need to change.  How they embrace the startup culture will vary from organisation to organisation.  Some will fund the start-ups, setting up innovation hubs - buying out the good ideas that fit their needs and wishing well those that don't.  Some will lessen the bureaucracy that they've constrained themselves with and allow more innovation to thrive from within.  Some will radically restructure themselves, becoming lean management, brand and policy units with subsidiaries that are there to make or break.

There will of course be those organisation that batten down the hatches and adopt a protective litigation stance. Though the chances are that those who look to embrace it will stand more chance of being relevant in 10 years time.

The upstart from the startup could also be your boss in 10 years time - so chose wisely who you have sleeping on your sofa!


Read my other posts
Just in Case - From early adoption to maturity
I have control - Can we truly own our identity
Tipping the balance - Getting the right balance between security and user experience
You don't know what you're doing Poor security practices are putting users at risk 
I didn't say you could touch me - Biometric authentication and identity
You don't need to tell me - Impacts of the EU General Data Protection Regulations
Coming together on being alone - The need for a clear government digital strategy
I'm not the person I used to be - Authentication for real world identities
Distributed Identity has no clothes - Will distributed ledger technology solve identity
Bring Your Own Downfall - Why we should embrace federated identity
Unblocking Digital Identity - Identity on the Blockchain as the next big thing
Tick to Agree - Doing the right thing with customer's data
The Kids Are All Right - Convenient authentication: the minimum standard for the younger generation
The ridiculous mouse - Why identity assurance must be a rewarding experience for users
Big Brother's Protection - How Big Brother can protect our privacy
I don't know who I am anymore - How to prove your identity online
Three Little Words - What it means for your business to be agile
Defining the Business Analyst - Better job descriptions for Business Analysis
Unexpected Customer Behaviour -  The role of self-service in your customer service strategy
Rip it up and start again - The successful Business Transformation
Too Big To Fail - Keeping the heart of your business alive
One Small Step - The practice of greatness
In pursuit of mediocrity - Why performance management systems drive mediocrity

About me

Bryn Robinson-Morgan is an independent Business Consultant with interests in Identity Assurance, Agile Organisational Design and Customer Centric Architecture.  Bryn has near 20 years experience working with some of the United Kingdom's leading brands and largest organisations.

Follow Bryn on Twitter: @No1_BA


Connect with Bryn on Linked In: Bryn Robinson-Morgan